Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Boros Aggro , Boros Convoke , Jeskai Convoke , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Arabella, Abandoned Doll ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Multi average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Arabella, Abandoned Doll is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: N/A (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aven Interrupter | Creature — Bird Rogue | 7 | 67.7% | 2 |
Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 5 | 60.3% | 1 |
Lightning Helix | Instant | 13 | 56.3% | 3 |
Painter's Studio/Defaced Gallery | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 23 | 54.4% | 3 |
The Wandering Rescuer | Legendary Creature — Human Samurai Noble | 6 | 49.5% | 1 |
Invasion of Gobakhan | Battle — Siege // Enchantment | 21 | 49.0% | 3 |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 80 | 47.3% | 11 |
Clockwork Percussionist | Artifact Creature — Monkey Toy | 52 | 47.3% | 7 |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 62 | 46.4% | 10 |
Protect the Negotiators | Instant | 62 | 46.4% | 10 |
Cards that perform better with Arabella, Abandoned Doll than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Convoke | 72 | 12.9% | 49.6% |
Boros Convoke | 25 | 44.6% | 36.5% |
Boros Aggro | 2 | 40.0% | 20.0% |
Unclassified | 2 | 1.0% | 33.3% |
1 | 1.7% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.